Strategic Responses to Industry Challenges: A Case Study of Naboni Enterprises

QUESTION

Naboni Enterprises 

Naboni was established in 1996 by Mr. Nicholas Menyani following a decision by the Government of Zambia to liberalize the Zambian economy. Prior to 1991, the Zambian economy had been dominated by Government ownership of business enterprises, resulting in State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) dominating many and major sectors of the Zambian economy. The liberalization of the Zambian economy in the nineties opened an opportunity for the private sector to own and run business. It was this opportunity that led to the establishment of Naboni Enterprises by Nicholas Menyani to supply transformers to the mining companies on the Copperbelt.

Supplying to the mines was a lucrative business. The mining sector was key to the Zambian economy: it not only contributed about 90 percent to the country’s tax revenue, but many manufacturing and commercial establishments depended on doing business with the mines for survival and prosperity. Because of the mining sector’s critical role in the Zambian economy, the Zambian Government had, for strategic reasons, retained control of mining. Faced with rising unemployment in the country, the Government had prevailed on mining companies to source supplies, such as minor equipment, spares, safety wear, and other specified services, from local suppliers. This arrangement suited both the mining companies and the local suppliers. For the mining companies, the bargaining power they enjoyed over local suppliers gave them wide latitude in negotiating the price they paid for the inputs they bought from the local suppliers. For the local suppliers, selling to the mines provided them with economic survival and a measure of selfemployment.

Nicholas Menyani had worked as a technician for one of the mining companies for twenty-five years until his retirement in 1990. When he retired. He established Page 3 of 7 Naboni Enterprises and the Company was based in Kitwe, a mining town known as the ‘hub’ of the Copperbelt. He did odd jobs in and around Kitwe which did not give him a regular income. When one of the mining companies, Konkola Copper Mines (KCM) tendered for the supply and maintenance of mining equipment, Menyani’s Company put in a bid and won the tender.

The contract Naboni Logistics had with KCM provided the former with a regular and steady income. And Naboni Logistics prospered. Then in late 2000, a South African company started showing interest in supplying and maintaining mining equipment to the mining sector in Zambia. Officials of the South African company held meetings with the Minister of Mines and officials of the Chamber of Mines to explore ways mining operations in Zambia could be improved. Menyani realized that the South African company would be a potential threat to Naboni if it ever decided to enter the Zambian mining sector by bringing skilled manpower and advanced machinery and equipment. There was likelihood that KCM might be interested in doing business with the South African company was heightened by recent technological developments in mining which revealed that newly invented machines and equipment had made mining operations easier and more efficient.

The threat of entry from the South African firm was exacerbated by a recession that befell the mining industry, which did not augur well for Naboni Enterprises. The decline of the copper industry was attributed to the low price of copper on the international market, the appearance of substitutes to copper, and the innovation of better and more advanced machinery and equipment. The combined effect of these developments compelled the mines to scale down their operations and to simultaneously look for more economic ways to carry out operations.

Foreseeing a bleak future, Naboni Enterprises decided to take several strategic measures to ensure survival. First, it repositioned its business by concentrating on those activities in which the company had a distinctive competence so that its performance would stand out and prevent the possibility of non-renewal of their Page 4 of 7 contract. This was complemented by the elimination of nonessential jobs. Second, it picked up the market share of rival suppliers that had been compelled to quit because they could not cope with the unfavorable business environment. Third, it diversified on the side into other business unrelated to mining. To this end, the company had established a primary school in Kitwe to widen its revenue.

REQUIRED: a) Michael Porter has argued that the profitability of a firm may be affected by, among other forces, the threat of new entrants, and bargaining power of buyers.

Explain to what extent these forces were a threat to the profitability of Naboni and discuss the strategic choices that were open to Naboni Enterprises. (20 Marks) 

b) Assess the significance of the strategies Naboni used in the face of the decline in the copper industry. (20 Marks)

ANSWER

Strategic Responses to Industry Challenges: A Case Study of Naboni Enterprises

In the ever-changing landscape of business, firms often face challenges that can impact their profitability and overall survival. This essay examines the case of Naboni Enterprises, a Zambian company operating in the mining sector, and analyzes the extent to which Michael Porter’s competitive forces – specifically the threat of new entrants and the bargaining power of buyers – posed threats to the firm’s profitability. Additionally, the essay evaluates the significance of the strategic choices made by Naboni Enterprises in response to the decline in the copper industry.

Threat of New Entrants and Bargaining Power of Buyers

Michael Porter’s five forces framework highlights the competitive dynamics that influence an industry’s profitability. In the case of Naboni Enterprises, the threat of new entrants and the bargaining power of buyers were prominent factors affecting the firm’s profitability.

Threat of New Entrants: The entry of a South African company into the Zambian mining sector posed a potential threat to Naboni Enterprises. This new entrant could bring advanced technology, skilled manpower, and better machinery, which could disrupt Naboni’s established position. The entry threat was exacerbated by the economic recession and technological advancements that altered the competitive landscape.

Bargaining Power of Buyers: Mining companies, including Naboni’s main client Konkola Copper Mines (KCM), held significant bargaining power due to their dominant position in the Zambian economy. They could negotiate prices and terms, potentially impacting Naboni’s profitability. Additionally, the economic downturn and technological changes led mining companies to seek more economic ways of operation, putting further pressure on suppliers like Naboni.

Strategic Choices Made by Naboni

Naboni Enterprises employed several strategic measures to navigate these challenges and ensure its survival:

Repositioning and Distinctive Competence: Naboni focused on activities where it had a distinctive competence, aiming to stand out and secure contract renewals. This strategic move aligned with Porter’s concept of differentiation, allowing Naboni to provide unique value to its clients.

Market Share Acquisition: Naboni capitalized on the exit of rival suppliers that couldn’t withstand the adverse business environment. By expanding its market share, Naboni solidified its position as a reliable supplier, reinforcing its relationships with clients like KCM.

Diversification: Recognizing the need to diversify beyond mining, Naboni established a primary school. This move not only provided an additional revenue stream but also demonstrated the firm’s commitment to the local community.

Significance of Strategies Amid the Copper Industry Decline

Naboni’s strategies were significant for multiple reasons:

Survival: The decline in the copper industry, driven by international market fluctuations and technological advancements, threatened Naboni’s core business. The strategic measures ensured the company’s survival by enabling it to adapt and remain relevant.

Competitive Advantage: Repositioning based on distinctive competence allowed Naboni to differentiate itself from competitors and maintain a competitive advantage.

Economic Resilience: Market share acquisition and diversification diversified Naboni’s revenue sources, making the company more resilient to industry downturns.

In conclusion, the competitive forces of new entrants and buyer bargaining power posed challenges to Naboni Enterprises’ profitability. The company’s strategic responses, including repositioning, market share acquisition, and diversification, were essential for surviving the decline in the copper industry. These strategies not only safeguarded the company’s existence but also positioned it for continued success in a volatile business environment.

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 Customer support
On-demand options
  • Tutor’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Attractive discounts
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Unique Features

As a renowned provider of the best writing services, we have selected unique features which we offer to our customers as their guarantees that will make your user experience stress-free.

Money-Back Guarantee

Unlike other companies, our money-back guarantee ensures the safety of our customers' money. For whatever reason, the customer may request a refund; our support team assesses the ground on which the refund is requested and processes it instantly. However, our customers are lucky as they have the least chances to experience this as we are always prepared to serve you with the best.

Zero-Plagiarism Guarantee

Plagiarism is the worst academic offense that is highly punishable by all educational institutions. It's for this reason that Peachy Tutors does not condone any plagiarism. We use advanced plagiarism detection software that ensures there are no chances of similarity on your papers.

Free-Revision Policy

Sometimes your professor may be a little bit stubborn and needs some changes made on your paper, or you might need some customization done. All at your service, we will work on your revision till you are satisfied with the quality of work. All for Free!

Privacy And Confidentiality

We take our client's confidentiality as our highest priority; thus, we never share our client's information with third parties. Our company uses the standard encryption technology to store data and only uses trusted payment gateways.

High Quality Papers

Anytime you order your paper with us, be assured of the paper quality. Our tutors are highly skilled in researching and writing quality content that is relevant to the paper instructions and presented professionally. This makes us the best in the industry as our tutors can handle any type of paper despite its complexity.