While you might think your project plan is perfect, would you bet your life on it? In the Second World War, a group of 220 captured airmen did just that — they staked the lives of everyone in the camp on the success of a project to secretly build a series of tunnels out of a prison camp their captors thought was escape proof. The prisoners formally structured their work as a project, using the project organization techniques of the day. The escape committee, under tremendous pressure, inspired their inmates around them to continue a fight considered lost. Not only did they have to stave off hunger, psychological pressures but deliver a project under acute circumstances. This meant understanding the problems facing them, focusing slender resources on the immediate task in hand, unifying the camp prisoners, and directing these into the project. With very little time the escape committee transformed the camp into an agile project one that could adapt to changing and unexpected daily situations.
There are 10 knowledge areas in Project Management (described below).
1. INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT – processes required to ensure all of the project’s components are coordinated. This includes project plan development processes and project planning.
2. SCOPE MANAGEMENT – processes that limit and control the work included in a project. These processes ensure that all the work of the project is included. This includes the initiation process as well as all the processes related to the scoping of the project.
3. TIME MANAGEMENT – processes required to ensure timely completion of the project. This includes the activity definition and sequencing processes.
4. COST MANAGEMENT – processes to ensure that a project is completed on time and within budget. This includes resource planning and cost budgeting.
5. QUALITY MANAGEMENT – processes that ensure the result of a project meets the needs for which the project was executed. This includes quality planning, assurance, and control.
6. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT – People are a major part of any project, and different people are required at various times; every person must be used effectively in order for the project to succeed.
7. COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT – processes to handle the substantial amount of communications that must occur in any project where information is created in a timely manner, and disseminated to the appropriate parties.
8. RISK MANAGEMENT – must be integral part of any project since everything doesn’t always go as planned.
9. PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT – processes that are used to manage what to procure and when to procure it.
10. PROJECT STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT – processes required to identify the people, groups, or organizations that could impact or be impacted by the project, to analyze stakeholder expectations and their impact on the project.
Use the of the knowledge areas listed and describe what the prisoners in THE GREAT ESCAPE did to demonstrate those knowledge areas (be specific).
• Then critically evaluate how they performed in those areas (what worked, what didn’t work, what could have been done better).
• Lastly, evaluate their entire escape project in its totality.
• Note that while the movie is not 100% accurate regarding the details, please use the movie as factual for our purposes.
“The Great Escape” is a classic film that portrays the real-life story of a group of Allied prisoners of war during World War II who attempted a daring escape from a high-security German prison camp. While the movie may take some creative liberties, it provides valuable insights into project management principles and challenges. This essay will analyze how the prisoners demonstrated the ten knowledge areas in project management, evaluate their performance in each area, and assess the entire escape project.
Integration Management: In the movie, the prisoners demonstrated integration management by establishing an escape committee responsible for coordinating various aspects of the project. This committee ensured that all efforts were aligned towards the common goal of escape. They also developed a comprehensive plan that incorporated various elements such as tunnel construction, forging documents, and disguises.
Evaluation: The integration management was successful in keeping the project on track. The committee effectively coordinated efforts and resources, ensuring that everyone worked towards the escape plan’s success. However, a more robust monitoring and control mechanism could have helped in adapting to unexpected challenges.
Scope Management: The prisoners limited and controlled the project’s scope by focusing on specific escape methods, such as tunnel construction. They initiated the project by conducting reconnaissance to identify the most suitable locations for tunneling.
Evaluation: The scope management was reasonably effective. The prisoners’ decision to narrow the scope to tunnel construction simplified the project, making it more manageable. However, they could have benefited from a more comprehensive initial assessment of resources and risks associated with tunnel construction.
Time Management: Time management was crucial to the escape project’s success. The prisoners effectively defined and sequenced activities related to tunnel construction and other escape preparations. They worked tirelessly on a strict schedule.
Evaluation: Time management was a strength of the escape project. The prisoners’ commitment to the timeline and their ability to stick to it demonstrated their discipline and dedication. However, unexpected setbacks, such as tunnel collapses, highlighted the need for more robust contingency planning.
Cost Management: While the prisoners did not have financial resources in the traditional sense, they managed their resources (tools, materials, and manpower) efficiently to ensure the project’s completion within limited means.
Evaluation: Cost management was effective given the constraints. The prisoners maximized the use of available resources, but they could have improved their resource planning to avoid shortages and reduce wastage.
Quality Management: The escape committee paid close attention to quality control in tunnel construction to ensure tunnels were safe and well-constructed. They performed quality assurance checks to maintain high standards.
Evaluation: Quality management was a success. The prisoners’ commitment to building safe tunnels demonstrated their dedication to the project’s success. Their attention to detail contributed to the project’s overall quality.
Human Resource Management: The prisoners recognized the importance of assigning the right individuals to specific tasks based on their skills and abilities. They formed a diverse team with various talents and expertise.
Evaluation: Human resource management was a key strength. The prisoners effectively utilized the skills of each team member, fostering a sense of unity and cooperation. However, they faced challenges with morale and burnout due to the high-stress environment.
Communication Management: Effective communication was critical in coordinating the project. The prisoners used secret codes, hidden messages, and covert signals to share information among the team members.
Evaluation: Communication management was successful in maintaining secrecy and coordination. However, there were instances of information leaks that could have been mitigated with stricter communication protocols.
Risk Management: The prisoners recognized the inherent risks in their escape plan and took steps to mitigate them. They conducted thorough risk assessments and adapted to changing circumstances.
Evaluation: Risk management was a vital aspect of the project’s success. The prisoners’ ability to adapt to unexpected challenges, such as security measures and tunnel collapses, showcased their resilience.
Procurement Management: While the prisoners did not procure goods in the traditional sense, they relied on resourcefulness and improvisation to acquire necessary materials, such as tools and clothing.
Evaluation: Procurement management demonstrated the prisoners’ resourcefulness. However, a more organized approach to resource acquisition could have improved efficiency.
Project Stakeholder Management: The prisoners identified stakeholders, such as their fellow inmates and the prison guards, and analyzed their potential impact on the project. They maintained secrecy to minimize negative stakeholder influence.
Evaluation: Stakeholder management was effective in minimizing external interference. The prisoners’ ability to maintain secrecy and unity among the inmates contributed to the project’s success.
Overall Evaluation: “The Great Escape” project was a remarkable demonstration of project management principles under extraordinary circumstances. The prisoners’ dedication, teamwork, and adaptability were commendable. While they faced challenges and setbacks, their project management skills, especially in time and risk management, allowed them to come remarkably close to achieving their goal.
However, there were areas for improvement, such as better resource planning, stricter communication protocols, and more comprehensive contingency planning. These shortcomings, while understandable given the circumstances, highlight the importance of continuous improvement in project management.
In conclusion, “The Great Escape” serves as a testament to the resilience and ingenuity of individuals working under extreme conditions. It also offers valuable lessons in project management, demonstrating the importance of effective planning, resource management, and adaptability in achieving project success, even in the most challenging situations.
As a renowned provider of the best writing services, we have selected unique features which we offer to our customers as their guarantees that will make your user experience stress-free.
Unlike other companies, our money-back guarantee ensures the safety of our customers' money. For whatever reason, the customer may request a refund; our support team assesses the ground on which the refund is requested and processes it instantly. However, our customers are lucky as they have the least chances to experience this as we are always prepared to serve you with the best.
Plagiarism is the worst academic offense that is highly punishable by all educational institutions. It's for this reason that Peachy Tutors does not condone any plagiarism. We use advanced plagiarism detection software that ensures there are no chances of similarity on your papers.
Sometimes your professor may be a little bit stubborn and needs some changes made on your paper, or you might need some customization done. All at your service, we will work on your revision till you are satisfied with the quality of work. All for Free!
We take our client's confidentiality as our highest priority; thus, we never share our client's information with third parties. Our company uses the standard encryption technology to store data and only uses trusted payment gateways.
Anytime you order your paper with us, be assured of the paper quality. Our tutors are highly skilled in researching and writing quality content that is relevant to the paper instructions and presented professionally. This makes us the best in the industry as our tutors can handle any type of paper despite its complexity.
Recent Comments