The Rustic Barn Company had encountered the problem of latent defects in some of its purchased rough metal barn frames. Being latent, the defects did not show up until after additional machining had taken place at Rustic Barn’s facility. This group of failures greatly irritated the manufacturing boss, who declared that “repairing those bad metal barn frames is eating up all our profits.” When the defects were discovered, the rough metal barn frames had to be taken off the machine, the defect polished out and repair-welded, and the metal barn frame re-machined when possible. Even with this process, 15 percent of the incoming metal frames ended up as scrap. Actually, 1,150 raw metal frames had to be purchased and machined in order to produce 1,000 good machined ones. The raw metal frames cost $500 each from either of two suppliers. Worse than the costs associated with rework and high scrap rates were the continual changes in production scheduling necessitated by a machined metal frame not being available as scheduled for production. These changes were costly because they required shop personnel to tear down the job they were working on and set up a new job. Marketing was constantly complaining about the firm’s inability to meet delivery commitments for the finished barn products that incorporated the metal frames. Marketing claimed many sales were lost as a result of this failure. Joan Jones, the production manager, and Mary Thomas, the vice president for marketing, asked Bob Shorb, the supply manager, to investigate the costs involved in supplying finished machined metal barn frames. If finished metal barn frames were purchased, the responsibility for finding hidden defects would be that of the supplier. Such action would encourage the supplier to improve the metal barn frame quality. Rustic Barn Company would accept and pay only for finished, usable metal barn frames. The internal cost of machining each incoming rough metal barn frame and repair-welding and re-machining it, as necessary, was approximately $300 per metal barn frame. This cost figure was based on $150 of direct labor and $150 of overhead. The cost of disrupted production schedules and operations was estimated at $100 per raw metal barn frame. Rustic Barn estimated the costs to go on-site and work with Suppliers to correct their problems could be $20 per good metal barn frame. Marketing estimated “lost sales” costs to be $50 per good metal barn frame. Bob approached all his major suppliers of rough metal barn frames in an attempt to generate interest for the supply of finished machined metal barn frames. Only one supplier, Superior Steel, showed genuine interest. Of major concern to all the framing companies was the $150,000 investment necessary to set themselves up to machine the raw metal barn frames. Superior Steel was willing both to invest in the necessary machines and to guarantee delivery of current demand of 1,000 units per year plus additional units necessary to meet future demand, provided Rustic Barn Company would contract with it as a sole source for the metal barn frames for the next three years. The price per finished metal barn frame would be $1,000 the first year, with a potential annual increase or decrease in price tied to an appropriate economic index that would be mutually agreed to and identified in the contract. Bob was faced with the problem of deciding whether to recommend (1) contracting with Superior Steel to buy finished metal barn frames, (2) continuing with the current process of buying rough metal frames and finishing them in-house, (3) working with current suppliers to reduce or eliminate defects or (4) developing other more attractive alternatives. The Rustic Barn machine shop was currently operating at 90 percent of capacity so it was not possible to make a reliable estimate of what would happen in the next few months, let alone the next three years. The decision of whether to buy finished metal frames was of major dollar importance to Rustic Barn Company because the firm currently used at least 1,000 finished metal frames per year and anticipated that this usage would continue for each of the next five years at a minimum. Please complete the Cost Analysis Chart below using the information above. Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6 Cost Element No. Units Unit Cost Per Casting Materials (raw castings) Materials (finished castings) Labor – Machining Overhead – Machining Production Disruption Supplier Problem Support Lost Sales Total Costs: Savings:
In the world of business, making informed decisions is vital to ensuring the sustainability and profitability of a company. Rustic Barn Company, a manufacturer of metal barn frames, found itself facing a critical decision regarding the cost implications of their production process. This essay will provide a cost analysis of various scenarios to help Rustic Barn Company optimize its decision-making process. We will evaluate the financial impact of different options, taking into consideration factors such as raw material costs, labor, overhead, production disruption, supplier support, and lost sales.
Rustic Barn Company’s current process involves purchasing rough metal barn frames, machining them in-house, and dealing with latent defects. Under this scenario, the costs involved are significant. The cost of raw materials is $500 per unit, and labor and overhead for machining amount to $150 per unit each. The company incurs an additional $100 per unit due to production disruptions and $50 per unit in lost sales, leading to a total cost of $850,000 for 1,000 units.
An alternative proposed by Superior Steel involves contracting for finished, machined metal barn frames at a cost of $1,000 per unit. This eliminates the need for in-house machining, labor, and overhead costs. However, Rustic Barn Company must bear supplier support costs of $20,000, in addition to the $50,000 in lost sales. This scenario results in a total cost of $1,070,000, representing a $220,000 cost increase compared to the current in-house process.
Scenario 3 involves working with current suppliers to reduce or eliminate defects. While maintaining the current raw material cost of $500 per unit, the company continues to incur labor, overhead, production disruption, and lost sales costs similar to Scenario 1. The added cost of supporting suppliers in defect reduction is $20,000. The total cost under this scenario amounts to $870,000, which is a $20,000 cost increase compared to the in-house machining process.
Scenarios 4 and 5, involving the development of alternative solutions, lack specific cost estimates in the provided information. These costs would heavily depend on the nature of the alternative solutions. Without further details, a comprehensive cost analysis cannot be conducted.
Scenario 6 accounts for the uncertainty surrounding future conditions. The Rustic Barn Company currently operates at 90% capacity, and predicting future developments remains challenging. This scenario lacks precise cost estimates due to the unpredictability of future events.
Rustic Barn Company faces a crucial decision that could significantly impact its operations and financial health. The analysis presented in this essay highlights the potential cost implications of various scenarios. While contracting with Superior Steel (Scenario 2) appears to result in increased costs, working with current suppliers (Scenario 3) has similar cost implications as the current in-house machining process (Scenario 1). Scenarios 4 and 5 require further information to determine their cost-effectiveness, and Scenario 6 remains uncertain.
Ultimately, Rustic Barn Company should consider various factors beyond cost, including long-term benefits, risks, and strategic alignment with its goals when making its decision. This essay serves as a starting point for a comprehensive evaluation, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of all relevant factors
As a renowned provider of the best writing services, we have selected unique features which we offer to our customers as their guarantees that will make your user experience stress-free.
Unlike other companies, our money-back guarantee ensures the safety of our customers' money. For whatever reason, the customer may request a refund; our support team assesses the ground on which the refund is requested and processes it instantly. However, our customers are lucky as they have the least chances to experience this as we are always prepared to serve you with the best.
Plagiarism is the worst academic offense that is highly punishable by all educational institutions. It's for this reason that Peachy Tutors does not condone any plagiarism. We use advanced plagiarism detection software that ensures there are no chances of similarity on your papers.
Sometimes your professor may be a little bit stubborn and needs some changes made on your paper, or you might need some customization done. All at your service, we will work on your revision till you are satisfied with the quality of work. All for Free!
We take our client's confidentiality as our highest priority; thus, we never share our client's information with third parties. Our company uses the standard encryption technology to store data and only uses trusted payment gateways.
Anytime you order your paper with us, be assured of the paper quality. Our tutors are highly skilled in researching and writing quality content that is relevant to the paper instructions and presented professionally. This makes us the best in the industry as our tutors can handle any type of paper despite its complexity.
Recent Comments