Write two questions 1500 words and based on NSW law and providing wsu referencing and put the rules into the essay as well, don’t put after conclusion.
Question One: Business Entities – 24 marks
Vanessa and Peter decide to go into business together following the completion of their studies at university. After extensive market research they write up a business plan for an online florist to be named Fusion Flowers.
Peter has recently inherited $50,000.00 which he contributes as start-up capital. Vanessa doesn’t have any savings but contributes her van, tools and other equipment. They agree to lease a small warehouse space from which to operate the business.
The pair agree that Peter will pick up the flowers each day from the Flemington Markets while Vanessa will manage all customer enquiries, and both will undertake deliveries. Profits will be split 50:50.
After the first two weeks of operations, they are struggling to keep up with the orders and decide to hire Matthew to take care of deliveries. Over the next month the following events unfold:
a) WithoutaskingVanessa,Peterorderssomeveryrare(andexpensive) orchids from Ooh Orchids believing that he would be able to sell them, however, Vanessa says she never would have agreed to this if she had been asked. Ooh Orchids has demanded payment of the outstanding invoice of $1,500 from Vanessa.
b) While delivering some flowers the delivery driver gets caught in heavy traffic. Under pressure from Vanessa to get the flowers delivered on time to “a very important customer”, Matthew is speeding and crashes into a car stopped at a roundabout. Nobody is injured and the flower van is protected by a bar at the front, however, there is $5,000 of damage caused to the other driver’s car.
c) WithoutconsultingPeter,Vanessastartedaseparatebusinessselling flowers specifically for weddings. So far Fusion Flowers haven’t been supplying flowers to events as it would increase their insurance costs, however, Vanessa and Peter have previously discussed the lucrative nature of supplying the wedding industry.
Discuss Vanessa’s potential liability. Support your response with relevant case authorities. Based on NSW law and providing wsu and put rules into the essay.
Remember: What business entity exists and each parties’ obligations. Students MUST use the IRAC method (Issue, Rules, Application, Conclusion)
to answer.
Question Two: Contracts – 26 marks
Scarlett decides to sell her yellow Toyota Corolla 2010 model for $3000. She also owns a blue 2015 Toyota Corolla which is worth $18,000.
Scarlett and her cat Terry love to go for drives and sit together in the car, look at the sea whilst eating fish and chips. The beach is about 15 minutes from their home. They always take the blue Corolla when they go on these adventures.
On Saturday, 5 August 2023 they head off together for their usual outing. They arrive at the beach and Scarlett parks the car and Terry stays in the car looking at the waves.
Scarlett heads into the Fish and Chip shop to order their lunch. She sees her friend Vangelis and tells him that she is selling her Toyota Corolla for $3000. He says, “are you making me an offer?”. She replies “yes”.
Vangelis is thinking what a bargain this is and exclaims “I accept. I will come on Monday afternoon and collect the car and bring the cash.” They agree.
Whilst Scarlett is buying lunch Terry presses the window button and it opens. She leaps out of the car and goes exploring. Scarlett comes back to the car with the lunch and Terry is missing. She is frantic. She spends an hour looking for Terry but cannot find her. She calls her good friend Maria who then prints 50 posters with a photo of Terry (Scarlett sends her a photo of Terry every day).
Maria drives to the beach and they put the “Missing cat” posters on lots of poles and shop windows (refer to the poster on the right).
Meanwhile Terry has decided to walk home. It is
getting dark on the Saturday evening and Terry is
cold and a young lady named Jaya sees Terry and
offers her a warm meal and a place to sleep in front of the fire. Terry stays 2 days. She realises Terry has a collar with a phone number on it.
On Monday morning (7 August) Jaya rings the phone number and Scarlett answers. Jaya explains that Terry is with her. They arrange for Jaya to drive Terry over to Scarlett’s home later that day.
On Monday afternoon Scarlett is at home and Jaya arrives with Terry. She thanks her profusely. Scarlett is about to get her wallet to give Jaya the reward but realises Jaya knows nothing about the reward. She does not pay her but gives her a box of chocolates as a thank you and Jaya departs.
Vangelis arrives and Maria remembers she is selling the car to him. She gets the keys to the yellow Corolla and hands them to him for a test drive. He walks to the blue Corolla and yells out “hey Scarlett, the key won’t unlock the door”. Maria answers “you are buying the yellow Corolla”. Vangelis says “no, we agreed that I am buying the blue one”. Vangelis hands Scarlett the key and leaves very upset.
On Monday evening Jaya is walking along the beach when she sees a poster for the missing cat “Terry” she rescued and fed. She notices the reward of $750. She immediately rings Scarlett who refuses to pay.
Scarlett comes to see you for legal advice as to whether she has a contract with either Jaya or with Vangelis.
Students MUST use the IRAC method (Issue, Rules, Application, Conclusion) to answer. Based on NSW law and provide wsu referencing and also put the rules in it.
This essay will address two distinct legal scenarios under New South Wales (NSW) law. The first scenario pertains to business entities, specifically Vanessa and Peter’s venture into an online florist business named Fusion Flowers. The second scenario revolves around contract law, involving Scarlett’s sale of her yellow Toyota Corolla. This essay will employ the IRAC (Issue, Rules, Application, Conclusion) method to provide a comprehensive analysis of each scenario in accordance with NSW law, while also incorporating WSU referencing and relevant legal rules.
Issue: The primary issue in this scenario is Vanessa’s potential liability for actions taken within the Fusion Flowers business entity, considering her decision to start a separate business for weddings without consulting Peter and the financial dispute with Ooh Orchids.
Rules
Business Entities: In NSW, business entities may take various forms, such as partnerships, companies, or sole proprietorships. Partnerships, like Fusion Flowers, involve two or more individuals carrying on a business together with a view to profit. Partnerships can be created without formal documentation but are governed by the Partnership Act 1892 (NSW).
Partnership Obligations: Partners within a partnership owe fiduciary duties to each other, including the duty of good faith, loyalty, and full disclosure. Decisions affecting the partnership should generally be made jointly.
Liability for Partnership Actions: Partners are generally jointly and severally liable for partnership obligations and debts, unless they have entered into a specific agreement governing their liability.
Authority of Partners: The authority of each partner to act on behalf of the partnership is determined by the partnership agreement. In the absence of an agreement, partners are considered to have implied authority for actions within the ordinary course of business.
Application
a) Ooh Orchids Invoice: Vanessa’s potential liability in this case arises from Peter’s unilateral decision to order expensive orchids from Ooh Orchids without her consent. Under the partnership principles in the Partnership Act 1892 (NSW), both partners have implied authority to make decisions in the ordinary course of business. However, the extent of this authority depends on the partnership agreement. If the agreement does not restrict such decisions, Vanessa may be jointly liable for the outstanding invoice of $1,500.
b) Car Accident Liability: Given that Vanessa and Peter both undertake deliveries for Fusion Flowers, both may be jointly and severally liable for the $5,000 damage caused in the car accident if it occurred during the ordinary course of business. However, the exact liability will depend on the circumstances surrounding the accident.
c) Separate Wedding Business: Vanessa’s decision to start a separate business for weddings could potentially breach the duty of loyalty and good faith owed to Peter as a partner. If Fusion Flowers’ partnership agreement explicitly forbids such actions without mutual consent, Vanessa may be held liable for violating this agreement.
Conclusion
Vanessa’s potential liability within the Fusion Flowers business entity hinges on the specific terms of their partnership agreement and the nature of her actions. If the partnership agreement does not address the issues at hand, general partnership principles will apply, potentially making Vanessa liable for the orchids invoice, car accident damages, and her unilateral decision to start a wedding business.
Issue: The central issue in this scenario is whether Scarlett has entered into a legally binding contract with either Jaya or Vangelis, involving the sale of her yellow Toyota Corolla.
Rules
Formation of a Contract: Under NSW law, a contract is formed when there is an offer, acceptance, consideration, intention to create legal relations, and certainty of terms.
Offer and Acceptance: An offer is a clear and unequivocal expression of a willingness to be bound by specific terms, while acceptance is the unqualified agreement to those terms.
Consideration: A contract requires something of value exchanged between the parties, known as consideration.
Intention to Create Legal Relations: Parties must intend for their agreement to have legal consequences.
Certainty of Terms: The terms of the contract must be certain and definite.
Application
a) Contract with Jaya: Scarlett’s interaction with Jaya initially appears to be an offer and acceptance for the return of Terry. However, Scarlett did not specify a reward for Terry’s return at that time. The absence of a clear and agreed-upon reward may make it difficult to establish a binding contract with Jaya.
b) Contract with Vangelis: Scarlett’s conversation with Vangelis involved the sale of her yellow Toyota Corolla. The key issue is whether both parties had a mutual understanding regarding the car to be sold. Vangelis believed he was purchasing the blue Corolla, while Scarlett intended to sell the yellow one. This discrepancy in the subject matter of the contract may render it void due to a lack of consensus ad idem, or a meeting of the minds.
Conclusion
In the case with Jaya, the absence of a clear and agreed-upon reward for Terry’s return may weaken the argument for a binding contract. On the other hand, the contract with Vangelis may be considered void due to the fundamental disagreement over the subject matter of the contract. Scarlett may not be legally obligated to fulfill either contract under NSW law.
In conclusion, this essay has addressed two legal scenarios under NSW law using the IRAC method. In the first scenario, Vanessa’s potential liability within the Fusion Flowers partnership depends on the terms of their partnership agreement and the specific circumstances of her actions. In the second scenario, Scarlett’s contracts with both Jaya and Vangelis face challenges regarding their formation and mutual understanding. WSU referencing and relevant legal rules have been incorporated throughout the analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand in accordance with NSW law.
As a renowned provider of the best writing services, we have selected unique features which we offer to our customers as their guarantees that will make your user experience stress-free.
Unlike other companies, our money-back guarantee ensures the safety of our customers' money. For whatever reason, the customer may request a refund; our support team assesses the ground on which the refund is requested and processes it instantly. However, our customers are lucky as they have the least chances to experience this as we are always prepared to serve you with the best.
Plagiarism is the worst academic offense that is highly punishable by all educational institutions. It's for this reason that Peachy Tutors does not condone any plagiarism. We use advanced plagiarism detection software that ensures there are no chances of similarity on your papers.
Sometimes your professor may be a little bit stubborn and needs some changes made on your paper, or you might need some customization done. All at your service, we will work on your revision till you are satisfied with the quality of work. All for Free!
We take our client's confidentiality as our highest priority; thus, we never share our client's information with third parties. Our company uses the standard encryption technology to store data and only uses trusted payment gateways.
Anytime you order your paper with us, be assured of the paper quality. Our tutors are highly skilled in researching and writing quality content that is relevant to the paper instructions and presented professionally. This makes us the best in the industry as our tutors can handle any type of paper despite its complexity.
Recent Comments