Ethics in Managerial Decision-Making: A Case Study

QUESTION

Ethics and the Manager

Ronald McDonald had recently been transferred to the Home Security Systems Division of National Home Products. Shortly after taking over his new position as divisional controller, he was asked to develop the division’s predetermined overhead rate for the upcoming year. The accuracy of the rate is important because it is used throughout the year and any underapplied overhead is closed out to Cost of Goods Sold at the end of the year. National Home Products uses direct labor hours in all of its divisions as the allocation base for manufacturing overhead.

To compute the predetermined overhead rate, Ronald divided his estimate of total manufacturing overhead for the coming year by the production manager’s estimate of the total direct labor hours for the coming year. He took his computations to the division’s general manager for approval but was quite surprised when he suggested a modification to the allocation base. His conversation with the general manager of the Home Security Systems Division, Mr. Burger King, went like this:

McDonald: Here are my calculations for next year’s predetermined overhead rate. If you approve, we can enter the rate into the computer on January 1 and be up and running in the job-order system right away this year.

King: Thanks for coming up the calculations so quickly, and they look just fine. There is, however, one slight modification I would like to see. Your estimate of the total direct labor hours for the year is 440,000 hours. How about cutting that to about 420,000?

McDonald:  I don’t know if I can do that. The production manager says that she will need about 440,000 direct labor hours to meet the sales-production for the year. Besides, there are going to be over 430,0000 direct labor hours during the current year and sales are projected to be higher next year.

King: Ronald, I know all of that. I would still like to reduce the direct labor hours in the allocation base to something like 420,000 hours. You probably don’t know that I had an agreement with your predecessor as divisional controller to shave 5% or so off the estimated direct labor hours every year. That way, we kept reserve that usually resulted in a big boost to net operating income at the end of the year in December. We called it our Christmas Bonus. Corporate headquarters always seemed to be pleased that we could pull off such a miracle at the end of the year. This system has worked well for many years, and I don’t want to change it now.

Required:

1. Explain how shaving 5% off the estimated direct labor hours in the allocation base for the predetermined overhead rate usually results in a big boost in net operating income at the end of the year.

2.  Should Ronald McDonald go along with the general manager’s request to reduce the direct labor hours in the predetermined overhead rate computation to 420,000 direct labor hours?

ANSWER

Ethics in Managerial Decision-Making: A Case Study

Introduction

The scenario involving Ronald McDonald and the Home Security Systems Division of National Home Products raises important ethical questions related to managerial decision-making. The primary issue centers around the manipulation of the predetermined overhead rate by reducing the estimated direct labor hours by 5% at the request of the division’s general manager, Mr. Burger King. This essay will examine the implications of such a practice on net operating income and the ethical considerations that Ronald McDonald should take into account when deciding whether to comply with Mr. Burger King’s request.

The Impact of Shaving 5% off Estimated Direct Labor Hours

Shaving 5% off the estimated direct labor hours in the allocation base for the predetermined overhead rate can indeed result in a significant boost in net operating income at the end of the year. This practice essentially overestimates the overhead costs and underestimates the allocation base, which is direct labor hours in this case. By doing so, the division would allocate a higher proportion of overhead costs to each unit of production, making the products appear more expensive to produce than they actually are. As a result, the division’s reported costs of goods sold would be artificially higher.

This manipulation has several implications

Increased product costs make the company’s products appear less competitive, which could lead to price increases.

The division can show a lower level of profitability throughout the year, which may influence performance evaluations and incentive compensation for managers.

The big boost to net operating income at the end of the year, termed the “Christmas Bonus,” might create an illusion of strong performance and financial health, which can please corporate headquarters and attract investors.

However, it’s essential to recognize that these apparent benefits are misleading and unethical. Such practices are not sustainable, as they misrepresent financial statements, distort the division’s true performance, and can eventually damage the company’s reputation.

Ronald McDonald’s Ethical Dilemma

Ronald McDonald, as the divisional controller, is faced with an ethical dilemma. On one hand, he has been presented with a longstanding practice that seemingly benefits the division by inflating end-of-year results. On the other hand, this practice involves misleading stakeholders, including corporate headquarters and potential investors. Ronald should consider the following factors when making his decision:

 Ethical Responsibility: As a manager, Ronald has a professional obligation to uphold ethical standards. Manipulating financial figures to mislead stakeholders is not in line with ethical principles.

 Long-Term Viability: While the “Christmas Bonus” practice may provide short-term gains, it is not a sustainable strategy. Over time, such actions can erode trust and integrity, potentially harming the division’s reputation and financial health.

Transparency and Accountability: A transparent and accurate financial reporting system is essential for building trust with shareholders and the broader business community. Misrepresenting financial data undermines transparency and accountability.

Legal Implications: Engaging in such manipulative practices can have legal repercussions, including potential violations of accounting and financial reporting regulations.

In conclusion, Ronald McDonald should not comply with Mr. Burger King’s request to reduce the direct labor hours in the predetermined overhead rate computation. Instead, he should uphold ethical principles, maintain the integrity of financial reporting, and prioritize the long-term sustainability and reputation of the division. By doing so, he can contribute to a culture of transparency and accountability that benefits the organization in the long run.

Ethical decision-making in managerial roles is crucial for maintaining trust, integrity, and long-term success in the business world. Manipulating financial figures for short-term gain is not a responsible or ethical approach and can have far-reaching consequences.

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 Customer support
On-demand options
  • Tutor’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Attractive discounts
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Unique Features

As a renowned provider of the best writing services, we have selected unique features which we offer to our customers as their guarantees that will make your user experience stress-free.

Money-Back Guarantee

Unlike other companies, our money-back guarantee ensures the safety of our customers' money. For whatever reason, the customer may request a refund; our support team assesses the ground on which the refund is requested and processes it instantly. However, our customers are lucky as they have the least chances to experience this as we are always prepared to serve you with the best.

Zero-Plagiarism Guarantee

Plagiarism is the worst academic offense that is highly punishable by all educational institutions. It's for this reason that Peachy Tutors does not condone any plagiarism. We use advanced plagiarism detection software that ensures there are no chances of similarity on your papers.

Free-Revision Policy

Sometimes your professor may be a little bit stubborn and needs some changes made on your paper, or you might need some customization done. All at your service, we will work on your revision till you are satisfied with the quality of work. All for Free!

Privacy And Confidentiality

We take our client's confidentiality as our highest priority; thus, we never share our client's information with third parties. Our company uses the standard encryption technology to store data and only uses trusted payment gateways.

High Quality Papers

Anytime you order your paper with us, be assured of the paper quality. Our tutors are highly skilled in researching and writing quality content that is relevant to the paper instructions and presented professionally. This makes us the best in the industry as our tutors can handle any type of paper despite its complexity.