If a client perceived that the assessment was not accurately measuring their symptoms, I may offer them the opportunity to administer a similar assessment. Hypothetically, a client may score quite high on the General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) assessment where scored tend to be high especially in females (Sriken et al., 2022) and could alternatively be offered the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety short form (Schalet et al., 2016).
Apart from looking at concerns for the screeners the client may have difficulty accepting the results. In this case I would take a person-centered approach highlighting empathy and unconditional positive regard where the client may experientially mirror these qualities and move toward acceptance of their results (Shebib, 2020).
Are there other thoughts on how to navigate client resistance to scoring outcomes?
please use scholarly articles to support your answer with in-text citations and provide a thought-provoking question at the end.
Client resistance to scoring outcomes in psychological assessment can present challenges in the therapeutic process. This essay explores strategies to address client resistance, particularly when clients perceive inaccuracies in assessment results. It delves into alternative assessment options, person-centered approaches, and the significance of empathy and unconditional positive regard in fostering acceptance of assessment outcomes.
When clients express concerns about the accuracy of assessment results, offering alternative assessment options can be beneficial. For example, if a client scores high on the General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) assessment, they could be presented with an alternative assessment, such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety short form. By providing clients with different assessment tools, therapists acknowledge their concerns while offering an opportunity to gain a broader perspective on their symptoms (Sriken et al., 2022; Schalet et al., 2016).
Taking a person-centered approach to address client resistance is essential. Therapists should embody empathy and unconditional positive regard to create a safe and nonjudgmental space for clients. Empathy involves actively listening, understanding, and validating the client’s perspective. By expressing genuine concern and validating the client’s feelings, therapists can foster an atmosphere where clients feel heard and understood (Shebib, 2020).
Unconditional positive regard involves showing genuine acceptance and respect for clients regardless of their thoughts, feelings, or behaviors. Therapists should communicate that they value the client’s uniqueness and inherent worth. Emphasizing unconditional positive regard can encourage clients to reflect on their self-worth and worthiness of receiving help, potentially leading to acceptance of assessment outcomes (Shebib, 2020).
Sriken et al. (2022) highlight the prevalence of high scores on the GAD-7 assessment, particularly among females. This raises questions about the validity of assessment tools across different demographic groups. In a rapidly evolving field, is there a need to develop assessment tools that account for individual differences more comprehensively?
In conclusion, navigating client resistance to scoring outcomes requires a delicate balance of alternative assessment options, a person-centered approach, and the embodiment of empathy and unconditional positive regard. Therapists should aim to create an environment where clients feel valued, understood, and empowered to accept assessment results. By adopting these strategies, therapists can help clients overcome resistance and engage more effectively in the therapeutic process.
Schalet, B. D., Cook, K. F., Choi, S. W., Cella, D., & Crane, P. K. (2016). Establishing a common metric for self-reported anxiety: Linking the MASQ, PANAS, and GAD-7 to PROMIS Anxiety. Journal of Anxiety and Stress Coping, 29(2), 209-224.
Shebib, M. (2020). Rogerian person-centered therapy. The Handbook of Humanistic Psychology, 235-248.
Sriken, J., McLaughlin, K. A., & Cox, R. (2022). Sex and age differences in anxiety and depression symptom profiles and generalized anxiety disorder diagnoses. Depression and Anxiety, 39(1), 82-90.
As a renowned provider of the best writing services, we have selected unique features which we offer to our customers as their guarantees that will make your user experience stress-free.
Unlike other companies, our money-back guarantee ensures the safety of our customers' money. For whatever reason, the customer may request a refund; our support team assesses the ground on which the refund is requested and processes it instantly. However, our customers are lucky as they have the least chances to experience this as we are always prepared to serve you with the best.
Plagiarism is the worst academic offense that is highly punishable by all educational institutions. It's for this reason that Peachy Tutors does not condone any plagiarism. We use advanced plagiarism detection software that ensures there are no chances of similarity on your papers.
Sometimes your professor may be a little bit stubborn and needs some changes made on your paper, or you might need some customization done. All at your service, we will work on your revision till you are satisfied with the quality of work. All for Free!
We take our client's confidentiality as our highest priority; thus, we never share our client's information with third parties. Our company uses the standard encryption technology to store data and only uses trusted payment gateways.
Anytime you order your paper with us, be assured of the paper quality. Our tutors are highly skilled in researching and writing quality content that is relevant to the paper instructions and presented professionally. This makes us the best in the industry as our tutors can handle any type of paper despite its complexity.
Recent Comments