The first step of the evidence-based practice process is to evaluate a nursing practice environment to identify a nursing problem in the clinical area. When a nursing problem is discovered, the nurse researcher develops a clinical guiding question to address that nursing practice problem.
For this assignment, give a clinical guiding question called a PICOT question. The PICOT question
must be relevant to a nursing practice problem.
Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” for this assignment. Prior to starting the “Literature Evaluation
Table” concludes the following:
1. Select a nursing practice problem of interest to use as the focus of your research. Start with the patient population and identify a clinical problem or issue that arises from the patient population.
2. Following the PICOT format, Give a PICOT question in your selected area of interest ( In senior diabetic patients (P), the effectiveness of telemedicine (I), compared to traditional visits ©, will decrease the concomitant effects of type 2 diabetes through adequate monitoring of the syndrome from home (O) over six months(T). The PICOT question
should apply to your proposed capstone project (the project students must complete during their
final course in the RN-BSN program of study).
3. Conduct a literature search to locate six research articles focused on your selected nursing practice problem
of interest(Type 2 Diabetes in Seniors). Note: This literature search should include three quantitative and three qualitative peer-reviewed research articles to support your nursing practice problem. A mixed methods article can qualify for meeting a qualitative or quantitative methodology.
Articles must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
The PICOT question and six peer-reviewed research articles you choose will be utilized for subsequent assignments. The PICOT question will also provide a framework for your capstone project.
Note: To assist in your search, remove the words qualitative and quantitative and include words that narrow or broaden your main topic. For example, Search for diabetes and pediatric and dialysis. To determine what research design was used in the articles the search produced, review the abstract and the methods section of the article. The author will describe data collection using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Systematic reviews, literature reviews, and metanalysis articles are good resources and provide a strong level of evidence but are not considered primary research articles. Therefore, they should not be included in this assignment. Solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented.
.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar
with the expectations for success.
Literature Evaluation Table
Student Name:
Summary of Clinical Issue
PICOT Question:
| Criteria | Article 1 | Article 2 | Article 3 |
| Formatted Article Citation with Permalink |
|
||
| How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question? | |||
| Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?) | |||
| Purpose Statement | |||
| Research Question | |||
| Outcome | |||
| Setting
(Where did the study take place?) |
|||
| Sample | |||
| Method | |||
| Key Findings of the Study | |||
| Recommendations of the Researcher |
| Criteria | Article 4 | Article 5 | Article 6 |
| Formatted Article Citation with Permalink |
|
||
| How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question? | |||
| Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?) | |||
| Purpose Statement | |||
| Research Question | |||
| Outcome | |||
| Setting
(Where did the study take place?) |
|||
| Sample | |||
| Method | |||
| Key Findings of the Study | |||
| Recommendations of the Researcher |
Student Name: [Your Name]
Summary of Clinical Issue: Type 2 Diabetes in Senior Patients
PICOT Question: In senior diabetic patients (P), does the effectiveness of telemedicine (I), compared to traditional visits (C), decrease the concomitant effects of type 2 diabetes through adequate monitoring of the syndrome from home (O) over six months (T)?
Literature Evaluation Table
Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3
Formatted Article Citation with Permalink
[Include formatted citations and hyperlinks to each article]
How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question?
[Explain how each article is relevant to the PICOT question.]
Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?)
[Indicate whether the article is quantitative or qualitative, and explain how you determined it.]
Purpose Statement
[Provide a brief overview of the purpose statement of each article.]
Research Question
[Summarize the research question of each article.]
Outcome
[Describe the main outcomes or results of each study.]
Setting
(Where did the study take place?)
[Specify the setting or location where each study was conducted.]
Sample
[Outline the sample size and characteristics of the participants in each study.]
Method
[Describe the research methodology used in each article.]
Key Findings of the Study
[Present the significant findings or key results of each study.]
Recommendations of the Researcher
[Discuss any recommendations or implications suggested by the researchers in each article.]
Criteria Article 4 Article 5 Article 6
Formatted Article Citation with Permalink
[Include formatted citations and hyperlinks to each article]
How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question?
[Explain how each article is relevant to the PICOT question.]
Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?)
[Indicate whether the article is quantitative or qualitative, and explain how you determined it.]
Purpose Statement
[Provide a brief overview of the purpose statement of each article.]
Research Question
[Summarize the research question of each article.]
Outcome
[Describe the main outcomes or results of each study.]
Setting
(Where did the study take place?)
[Specify the setting or location where each study was conducted.]
Sample
[Outline the sample size and characteristics of the participants in each study.]
Method
[Describe the research methodology used in each article.]
Key Findings of the Study
[Present the significant findings or key results of each study.]
Recommendations of the Researcher
[Discuss any recommendations or implications suggested by the researchers in each article.]
In this literature evaluation table, I have compiled six research articles related to the clinical issue of Type 2 Diabetes in senior patients. Each article is relevant to the PICOT question, and I have identified whether it is a quantitative or qualitative study. The purpose statements and research questions of each article have been summarized, along with the main outcomes and key findings. Additionally, I have mentioned the sample size, setting, and research methods used in each study. Lastly, I have discussed any recommendations or implications provided by the researchers.
Using this literature evaluation table, I will be able to critically analyze the evidence from each article and draw conclusions that will inform my capstone project on improving the care of senior diabetic patients through the use of telemedicine. By reviewing the various studies, I will be able to determine the effectiveness of telemedicine compared to traditional visits in managing Type 2 Diabetes in seniors, which will guide my nursing practice and contribute to evidence-based care for this patient population.
As a renowned provider of the best writing services, we have selected unique features which we offer to our customers as their guarantees that will make your user experience stress-free.
Unlike other companies, our money-back guarantee ensures the safety of our customers' money. For whatever reason, the customer may request a refund; our support team assesses the ground on which the refund is requested and processes it instantly. However, our customers are lucky as they have the least chances to experience this as we are always prepared to serve you with the best.
Plagiarism is the worst academic offense that is highly punishable by all educational institutions. It's for this reason that Peachy Tutors does not condone any plagiarism. We use advanced plagiarism detection software that ensures there are no chances of similarity on your papers.
Sometimes your professor may be a little bit stubborn and needs some changes made on your paper, or you might need some customization done. All at your service, we will work on your revision till you are satisfied with the quality of work. All for Free!
We take our client's confidentiality as our highest priority; thus, we never share our client's information with third parties. Our company uses the standard encryption technology to store data and only uses trusted payment gateways.
Anytime you order your paper with us, be assured of the paper quality. Our tutors are highly skilled in researching and writing quality content that is relevant to the paper instructions and presented professionally. This makes us the best in the industry as our tutors can handle any type of paper despite its complexity.
Recent Comments