“My doctor wanted me to come into the hospital to be admitted.”
HPI
Wilbur Elliott is a 79-year-old man who originally presented to the hospital 1 month ago with
symptoms of heart failure that culminated in mitral valve replacement surgery. His surgery was
complicated by a 1-hour hypotensive episode, with BP of 70/50 mm Hg during surgery.
At three days post-op, purulent drainage was noted from the surgical site and he was subsequently
diagnosed with mediastinitis. At that time, he was also found to have Serratia bacteremia (blood
cultures × 4 positive for Serratia marcescens, sensitive to gentamicin, piperacillin, ceftazidime,
ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin; resistance was noted to ampicillin). Therapy was initiated with
gentamicin and ceftazidime.
Thus far, he has completed day 21 of a 6-week course of antibiotics. A gradual increase in his BUN
and serum creatinine concentrations from baseline were noted and signs of volume overload are
present.
PMHx
• Type 2 DM
• CKD
• Dyslipidemia
• Osteoarthritis
• HTN
• Heart failure
• Depression
PSHx
Mechanical mitral valve replacement surgery 28 days ago
CHP/LSN/DGS 1
Allergies
NKDA, NKFA
FamilyHx
Father had type 2 DM
SocHx
Lives at home with wife; has six children, all living out of state. Retired 11 years ago, coal miner.
Denied nicotine/ETOH/illicit substances.
ROS
Currently complains of trouble breathing, weakness, general malaise, and pain in right hand. No fever
or chills
Constitutional
Confused-appearing man in mild distress
VS
BP 152/90 mm Hg, P 80 bpm, RR 26, T 37.7°C; current Wt 80 kg (admission Wt 75 kg), Ht 5′9′′
Skin
Turgor intact, surgical incision site healing with no drainage
3
HEENT
Head/face: normocephalic/atraumatic.
Eyes: eyebrows/lashes evenly distributed, no lesions noted, sclera white, conjunctiva pink, no
discharge noted, PERRLA present 4 mm to 3 mm, bilaterally, EOMs intact, fundoscopic exam without
arteriolar narrowing, nicking, hemorrhages, exudates or papilledema, bilaterally.
Sinus/nose: no palpable sinus tenderness, nares patent, no edema/discharge/polyps.
Ears: external ears skin intact, skin color similar to facial skin tone, no discharge noted from auditory
canal.
Oropharynx: tongue midline, pink, moist, no lesions noted ventral/dorsal surface, poor dentition
pharynx: uvula midline, tonsils +1, bilaterally, without erythema or exudates.
Neck: trachea midline, JVD, neck supple, mild tenderness with palpation over trapezius bilaterally,
thyroid not palpable, no lymphadenopathy, carotid pulses palpable +2, bilaterally, no carotid bruits
auscultated.
Lungs
Symmetrical rise/fall of thorax; no tenderness with palpation; increased tactile fremitus noted to bases,
bilaterally; inspiratory wheezes and bibasilar crackles noted.
Cardiac
S1, S2, irregular, no m/r/g
Abdomen
Rounded abdomen, no scars/lesions, non-distended, hypoactive BS x4 quadrants, no bruits
appreciated, general tympany with percussion, no organomegaly or masses
Genit/Rect
No stool noted. No masses noted.
MS/Ext
2+ ankle/sacral edema; some tenderness and limited motion in right hand.
Neuro
A & O to person and place, but not to time.
Labs
Na 139 mEq/L Hgb 9.7 g/dL Ca 8.6 mg/dL
K 3.7 mEq/L Hct 29.5% Mg 2.1 mg/dL
Cl 103 mEq/L Plt 303 × 103/mm3 Phos 4.4 mg/dL
CO2 24 mEq/L WBC 8.6 × 103/mm3 INR 2.7
BUN 50 mg/dL (BUN 19 mg/dL on admission)
SCr 3.2 mg/dL (SCr 1.5 mg/dL on admission)
Glu 119 mg/dL
UA
Color, yellow; character, hazy; glucose (-); ketones (-); SG 1.010; pH 5.0; protein 30 mg/dL; coarse
granular casts 5-10/lpf; WBC 0-3/hpf; RBC 0-2/hpf; no bacteria; nitrite (-); osmolality 325 mOsm;
urinary sodium 45 mEq/L; creatinine 33 mg/dL, FENA 3.1%.
Repeat Blood Cultures Today
Negative
Fluid Intake/Output and Daily Weights
Day I/O Weight (kg)
3 days ago 3200 mL/900 mL N/A
2 days ago 2600 mL/1000 mL 76
Yesterday 2800 mL/1300 mL N/A
Today N/A 80
ASSESSMENT AND DIAGNOSIS
1. What are some initial differential diagnoses for the chief complaint? Support each response with
clinical reasoning & judgement.
2. What is the diagnosis? How is the patient’s presentation consistent with the diagnosis? Include,
objective & subjective findings (signs, symptoms, pertinent labs & diagnostic testing, when
applicable).
3. Explain the underlying pathophysiology for the diagnosis. Include etiology & risk factors in your
response.
4. Assess the severity of the condition. What are the potential complications & prognosis for the
diagnosis?
Wilbur Elliott, a 79-year-old male, presents with symptoms of heart failure, mitral valve replacement surgery, and subsequent complications leading to drug-induced acute kidney injury (AKI). This essay will discuss the initial differential diagnoses, the confirmed diagnosis of drug-induced AKI, the underlying pathophysiology, and the severity, potential complications, and prognosis for the condition.
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF): ADHF could present with symptoms of trouble breathing, fluid overload, and altered mental status, similar to Wilbur’s presentation. However, Wilbur’s surgical history and blood work indicate other underlying issues.
Sepsis: Sepsis can manifest with systemic inflammation, hypotension, and organ dysfunction, including AKI. Although Wilbur had a post-operative infection, his stable vital signs and lack of fever suggest otherwise.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI): AMI may cause hypotension, chest pain, and ST-segment changes on an ECG. However, the absence of chest pain and specific ECG findings does not align with this diagnosis.
Wilbur’s presentation is consistent with drug-induced AKI due to his recent exposure to gentamicin and ceftazidime therapy for mediastinitis and Serratia bacteremia. The acute onset of increased serum creatinine and BUN levels, along with purulent drainage from the surgical site, raises suspicion for nephrotoxicity from the antibiotics.
Objective & Subjective Findings:
Increased serum creatinine (3.2 mg/dL) and BUN (50 mg/dL)
Decreased urine output
Ankle/sacral edema and bibasilar crackles on lung examination
Limited motion and tenderness in the right hand
The nephrotoxicity associated with aminoglycoside antibiotics like gentamicin is primarily mediated by oxidative stress, leading to renal tubular cell damage. Ceftazidime can also cause nephrotoxicity, albeit less frequently. The combination of these antibiotics may have contributed to the development of drug-induced AKI in Wilbur, especially given his pre-existing risk factors like age, previous heart failure, and kidney disease.
Wilbur’s drug-induced AKI is considered severe due to the significant rise in serum creatinine and BUN levels. Potential complications include fluid overload, electrolyte imbalances, and uremia. The prognosis for drug-induced AKI depends on early recognition and prompt cessation of the offending medications. With appropriate management, recovery is possible, but there may be a risk of residual renal impairment.
Wilbur Elliott’s presentation is consistent with drug-induced acute kidney injury caused by nephrotoxic antibiotics he received post-mitral valve replacement surgery. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology and promptly discontinuing the offending medications are critical to managing the condition effectively. As an EMR, recognizing the severity and potential complications of drug-induced AKI will aid in providing appropriate care and facilitating a positive outcome for the patient.
As a renowned provider of the best writing services, we have selected unique features which we offer to our customers as their guarantees that will make your user experience stress-free.
Unlike other companies, our money-back guarantee ensures the safety of our customers' money. For whatever reason, the customer may request a refund; our support team assesses the ground on which the refund is requested and processes it instantly. However, our customers are lucky as they have the least chances to experience this as we are always prepared to serve you with the best.
Plagiarism is the worst academic offense that is highly punishable by all educational institutions. It's for this reason that Peachy Tutors does not condone any plagiarism. We use advanced plagiarism detection software that ensures there are no chances of similarity on your papers.
Sometimes your professor may be a little bit stubborn and needs some changes made on your paper, or you might need some customization done. All at your service, we will work on your revision till you are satisfied with the quality of work. All for Free!
We take our client's confidentiality as our highest priority; thus, we never share our client's information with third parties. Our company uses the standard encryption technology to store data and only uses trusted payment gateways.
Anytime you order your paper with us, be assured of the paper quality. Our tutors are highly skilled in researching and writing quality content that is relevant to the paper instructions and presented professionally. This makes us the best in the industry as our tutors can handle any type of paper despite its complexity.
Recent Comments